S, R (on the application of) v Swindon Borough Council & Anor [2001] EWHC Admin 334 (4th May, 2001)
Local authorities are entitled and required to act on reasonable cause to suspect a risk of significant harm to children under section 47 of the Children Act 1989, without needing to establish abuse on the balance of probabilities. Their actions in assessing risk and disclosing information were justified,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2001] EWHC Admin 334
- Parties
- Claimant: S; First Defendant: Swindon Borough Council; Second Defendant: Wiltshire County Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment After Oral Hearing
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Children Act 1989, Local Authority Child Protection Duties, Standard of Proof in Child Protection, Disclosure of Information by Social Services, Article 8 ECHR (right to Private and Family Life)
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
S
Claimant
Swindon Borough Council
First Defendant
Wiltshire County Council
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment After Oral Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether local authorities applied the correct statutory test under the Children Act 1989 in assessing risk to children after claimant's acquittal of sexual abuse charges
- 2 Whether local authorities are required to establish abuse on the balance of probabilities before taking protective action or disclosing information
- 3 Whether the actions of the authorities breached the claimant's rights under Article 8 ECHR
Ratio Decidendi
Local authorities are entitled and required to act on reasonable cause to suspect a risk of significant harm to children under section 47 of the Children Act 1989, without needing to establish abuse on the balance of probabilities. Their actions in assessing risk and disclosing information were justified, proportionate, and did not breach the claimant's rights under Article 8 ECHR. The authorities' decisions were not irrational or unlawful.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- Application for judicial review refused
- No order for relief against the defendants
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment