M (A Child)
The allegations of bias were not sufficiently arguable to justify setting aside the judge's orders; the refusal to order a further CAFCASS report was within the judge's discretion; the section 91(14) order was justified but should be limited to three years to ensure proportionality.
- Parties
- Applicant Mother: MM; Respondent Father: KM
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 December 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal and Appeal
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal refused on residence order; permission granted and appeal allowed in part on section 91(14) order to impose a three-year moratorium.
- Legal Topics
- Child Residence, Contact Orders, Section 91(14) Children Act 1989, Judicial Bias, CAFCASS Reports
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MM
Applicant Mother
KM
Respondent Father
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal and Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judge was biased against the applicant mother
- 2 Whether refusal to order a further CAFCASS report was proper
- 3 Whether a section 91(14) order was justified and proportionate
Ratio Decidendi
The allegations of bias were not sufficiently arguable to justify setting aside the judge's orders; the refusal to order a further CAFCASS report was within the judge's discretion; the section 91(14) order was justified but should be limited to three years to ensure proportionality.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal refused on residence order; permission granted and appeal allowed in part on section 91(14) order to impose a three-year moratorium.
Orders
- Permission to appeal refused in relation to the residence order.
- Permission to appeal granted in relation to the section 91(14) order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment