S v S
The court found that there were no reliable or enforceable safeguards to protect the child and mother if returned to Iran, given the father's manipulative and controlling behaviour and the risk of Iranian courts not upholding agreements or English court orders. The child's welfare required her to remain in England with her mother, subject to appropriate contact with the father.
- Parties
- Mother: S; Father: S
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 July 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Children's Case / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Father's application for return of the child to Iran dismissed; residence with mother confirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Child Residence, International Child Relocation, Contact Arrangements, Wardship, Domestic Violence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
S
Mother
S
Father
Procedural Posture
Children's Case / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the child A should be returned to Iran
- 2 Whether sufficient safeguards exist for the child's welfare if returned to Iran
- 3 Nature of parental relationship and impact on child
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that there were no reliable or enforceable safeguards to protect the child and mother if returned to Iran, given the father's manipulative and controlling behaviour and the risk of Iranian courts not upholding agreements or English court orders. The child's welfare required her to remain in England with her mother, subject to appropriate contact with the father.
Court Disposition
Father's application for return of the child to Iran dismissed; residence with mother confirmed.
Orders
- Child A to remain resident with her mother in England
- Appropriate contact between father and child by Skype and in person, subject to safeguards
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment