M (Children) (Suspected Trafficking: Competent Authority), Re
There was a credible suspicion that the children were brought to the UK for an unlawful purpose, possibly trafficking, and the grandmother's account of the trip was not accepted as truthful. The threshold for interim care orders was met on an interim basis. The court declined to discharge the interim care order or return the children to the grandmother pending further enquiries by the Competent Authority and clarification from Namibian authorities. DNA evidence later confirmed the familial relationship, and the Competent Authority's negative conclusive grounds decision on trafficking ended the English court's role, with arrangements for the children's return to Namibia under Namibian...
- Parties
- Applicant / Local Authority: Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council; Respondent / Mother: Mother (name withheld for anonymity); Respondent / Father: Father (name withheld for anonymity); Respondent / Grandmother: Grandmother (name withheld for anonymity); Subject Children: Children (JM and EM, names withheld for anonymity); Intervenor: Competent Authority, National Referral Mechanism (NRM) / Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 March 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Care Proceedings Under the Children Act 1989 / Interim Judgment With Postscript Following Further Hearing and Final Directions
- Outcome
- Interim care order continued pending further enquiries; later, following DNA confirmation and negative trafficking findings, arrangements made for return of children to Namibia and conclusion of English proceedings.
- Legal Topics
- Child Trafficking, Jurisdiction Under Brussels II Revised (biir), Interim Care Orders, Return of Children to Country of Habitual Residence, Role of Competent Authority in Trafficking Cases, Guardianship and Parental Responsibility, International Cooperation in Child Welfare
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council
Applicant / Local Authority
Mother (name withheld for anonymity)
Respondent / Mother
Father (name withheld for anonymity)
Respondent / Father
Grandmother (name withheld for anonymity)
Respondent / Grandmother
Children (JM and EM, names withheld for anonymity)
Subject Children
Competent Authority, National Referral Mechanism (NRM) / Secretary of State for the Home Department
Intervenor
Procedural Posture
Care Proceedings Under the Children Act 1989 / Interim Judgment With Postscript Following Further Hearing and Final Directions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the children were victims of trafficking or at risk of significant harm
- 2 Whether the threshold for interim care orders under section 31 Children Act 1989 was met
- 3 Jurisdiction of the English court under BIIR Article 20 and forum conveniens
Ratio Decidendi
There was a credible suspicion that the children were brought to the UK for an unlawful purpose, possibly trafficking, and the grandmother's account of the trip was not accepted as truthful. The threshold for interim care orders was met on an interim basis. The court declined to discharge the interim care order or return the children to the grandmother pending further enquiries by the Competent Authority and clarification from Namibian authorities. DNA evidence later confirmed the familial relationship, and the Competent Authority's negative conclusive grounds decision on trafficking ended the English court's role, with arrangements for the children's return to Namibia under Namibian...
Court Disposition
Interim care order continued pending further enquiries; later, following DNA confirmation and negative trafficking findings, arrangements made for return of children to Namibia and conclusion of English proceedings.
Orders
- Children to remain in interim care pending further enquiries and hearing.
- DNA testing ordered to confirm familial relationships.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment