Harding v Wealands
The Court of Appeal held that the law of New South Wales applies to all substantive issues, including the assessment of damages, and that the restrictions on damages under the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW) are substantive and must be applied by the English court. The general rule under s.11 of the 1995 Act was not displaced, and the restrictions are not procedural matters for the lex fori.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Harding; Defendant/appellant: Wealands
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 December 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Preliminary Issues
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Choice of Law in Tort, Substance Vs Procedure, Assessment of Damages, Forum Shopping
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Harding
Claimant/respondent
Wealands
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Preliminary Issues
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the law of New South Wales or England applies to the assessment of damages in a tort claim arising from an accident in New South Wales
- 2 Whether statutory restrictions on damages under the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW) are substantive or procedural for the purposes of English conflict of laws
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal held that the law of New South Wales applies to all substantive issues, including the assessment of damages, and that the restrictions on damages under the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW) are substantive and must be applied by the English court. The general rule under s.11 of the 1995 Act was not displaced, and the restrictions are not procedural matters for the lex fori.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Order of Elias J. dated 27th May 2004 set aside
- Declaration that the law applicable to all substantive issues is the law of New South Wales
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment