Perry v F H Brundle & Ors [2017] EWHC 678 (IPEC) (30 March 2017)

Mr Perry intends to bring claims and applications in the future that are totally without merit, and an extended civil restraint order would not be sufficient or appropriate; therefore, a general civil restraint order is necessary to prevent further abuse of the court's process.

Citation: [2017] EWHC 678 (IPEC)
Parties: Claimant: Richard Perry; First Defendant: F H Brundle; Second Defendant: Betafence Limited; Third Defendant: Britannia Fasteners Limited
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Judgment Date: 30 March 2017
Procedural Posture: Application for General Civil Restraint Order / Judgment on Application
Outcome: General Civil Restraint Order granted against the claimant for two years from 27 March 2017.
Legal Topics: Civil Restraint Orders, Patent Infringement, Abuse of Process

Civil Procedure Intellectual Property Civil Restraint Orders Patent Infringement Abuse of Process

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5

Parties

Richard Perry

Claimant

F H Brundle

First Defendant

Betafence Limited

Second Defendant

Britannia Fasteners Limited

Third Defendant

Procedural Posture

Application for General Civil Restraint Order / Judgment on Application

Legal Issues

1 Whether a General Civil Restraint Order should be granted against the claimant
2 Whether the claimant's intended claims and applications are totally without merit

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

General Civil Restraint Order granted against the claimant for two years from 27 March 2017.

Orders

General Civil Restraint Order against Richard Perry for two years commencing 27 March 2017