Morgan v Southend County Court
The application for permission to appeal was refused because the claims were wholly devoid of merit, amounted to an abuse of process, and there was no justification for the Court of Appeal's interference. The applicant's proper recourse was to apply in the County Court to set aside the orders made without notice.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Michael Morgan; Defendant/respondent: Southend County Court; Defendant/respondent: Basildon Community Housing Association; Defendant/respondent: Chief Constable of Essex Police
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 November 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application refused
- Legal Topics
- Civil Restraint Orders, Abuse of Process, Damages for Unlawful Eviction, Statutory Tort, Article 6 ECHR
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Morgan
Claimant/appellant
Southend County Court
Defendant/respondent
Basildon Community Housing Association
Defendant/respondent
Chief Constable of Essex Police
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the orders striking out the claims were justified as an abuse of process
- 2 Whether the Civil Restraint Order was properly made
- 3 Whether the applicant had viable claims under sections 12 and 27 of the Housing Act 1988
Ratio Decidendi
The application for permission to appeal was refused because the claims were wholly devoid of merit, amounted to an abuse of process, and there was no justification for the Court of Appeal's interference. The applicant's proper recourse was to apply in the County Court to set aside the orders made without notice.
Court Disposition
Application refused
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal refused
- Transcript of judgment to be supplied to appellant at public expense
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment