RUPERT ST JOHN WEBSTER v JOHN FRANCIS PENLEY & Anor.
It is necessary and proportionate to extend the ECRO against Mr Webster for a further two years to protect the applicants and the court from further vexatious litigation, given his persistent conduct and lack of acceptance of previous court orders.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Rupert St John Webster; Defendant/applicant: John Francis Penley; Defendant/applicant: Alison Virginia Ashcroft
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 March 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Application for Extension of Extended Civil Restraint Order
- Outcome
- Application granted in part
- Legal Topics
- Civil Restraint Orders, Vexatious Litigation, Practice Direction 3 C, CPR 3.11
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rupert St John Webster
Claimant/respondent
John Francis Penley
Defendant/applicant
Alison Virginia Ashcroft
Defendant/applicant
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Extension of Extended Civil Restraint Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the extended civil restraint order (ECRO) against Mr Webster should be further extended
- 2 What is the correct legal test for extension under Practice Direction 3C, paragraph 3.10
Ratio Decidendi
It is necessary and proportionate to extend the ECRO against Mr Webster for a further two years to protect the applicants and the court from further vexatious litigation, given his persistent conduct and lack of acceptance of previous court orders.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part
Orders
- The extended civil restraint order made by Morgan J on 10 February 2021 is extended for a further period of two years from 10 March 2023.
- Mr Webster is to pay the applicants' costs of the application, assessed at £14,000 on the standard basis.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment