Nowak v The Nursing and Midwifery Council & Anor (Rev 1)
The claimant persistently issued applications totally without merit, even after his claim was struck out and judgment entered against him. There is a clear risk of further abuse of the court's process. An extended civil restraint order is necessary and proportionate to protect the court's resources and is compatible with Article 6 ECHR.
- Parties
- Claimant: Przemyslaw Nowak; 1st Defendant: The Nursing and Midwifery Council; 2nd Defendant: Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 July 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment on Extended Civil Restraint Order
- Outcome
- Extended civil restraint order made against claimant.
- Legal Topics
- Civil Restraint Orders, Vexatious Litigation, Article 6 ECHR, Costs, Disclosure, Harassment, Whistleblowing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Przemyslaw Nowak
Claimant
The Nursing and Midwifery Council
1st Defendant
Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment on Extended Civil Restraint Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an extended civil restraint order should be made against the claimant
- 2 Compatibility of civil restraint orders with Article 6 ECHR
- 3 Persistent issuance of applications totally without merit
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant persistently issued applications totally without merit, even after his claim was struck out and judgment entered against him. There is a clear risk of further abuse of the court's process. An extended civil restraint order is necessary and proportionate to protect the court's resources and is compatible with Article 6 ECHR.
Court Disposition
Extended civil restraint order made against claimant.
Orders
- Claimant must obtain permission before issuing any claim or application in the High Court or any county court against either defendant or relating to the proceedings.
- Exceptions for applications to set aside or vary orders of 5 March 2013 and 16 April 2013, and rights of appeal under Nursing and Midwifery Order 2001.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment