Eagle Star Insurance Company Ltd. v Cresswell & Ors [2004] EWCA Civ 602 (14 May 2004)
The Claims Co-operation Clause (in fact a claims control clause) allocated to reinsurers the right to control negotiations and settlement of claims. The clause's language—'will not be liable to pay any claim not controlled as set out above'—is clear and operates as a condition precedent to liability. As reinsurers did not control the negotiation or settlement of the Varian claim, and absent waiver or estoppel, they are not liable to indemnify Eagle Star. The 'follow the settlements' clause does not override this requirement, as the typed clauses prevail and specifically require reinsurers' control or consent for liability to arise.
- Citation
- [2004] EWCA Civ 602
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Eagle Star Insurance Company Limited; Defendants/appellants: J N Cresswell & Others
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 May 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Queen's Bench Division (commercial Court) / Appeal – Judgment on Preliminary Issues
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Claims Co Operation Clauses, Claims Control Clauses, Follow the Settlements Clauses, Condition Precedent, Policy Construction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Eagle Star Insurance Company Limited
Claimant/respondent
J N Cresswell & Others
Defendants/appellants
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Queen's Bench Division (commercial Court) / Appeal – Judgment on Preliminary Issues
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether compliance with sub-paragraph (b) of the Claims Co-operation Clause is a condition precedent to liability under the reinsurance policy
- 2 Whether reinsurers are bound to indemnify the claimant under the 'follow the settlements' clause despite breach of the Claims Co-operation Clause
Ratio Decidendi
The Claims Co-operation Clause (in fact a claims control clause) allocated to reinsurers the right to control negotiations and settlement of claims. The clause's language—'will not be liable to pay any claim not controlled as set out above'—is clear and operates as a condition precedent to liability. As reinsurers did not control the negotiation or settlement of the Varian claim, and absent waiver or estoppel, they are not liable to indemnify Eagle Star. The 'follow the settlements' clause does not override this requirement, as the typed clauses prevail and specifically require reinsurers' control or consent for liability to arise.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Preliminary issue 3 answered: Unless some reason is shown for excusing the agreed fact that reinsurers did not control the negotiations or settlement, sub-paragraph (b) amounts to an exclusion of liability to indemnify Eagle Star.
- Preliminary issue 4 answered: Reinsurers are not bound to follow the Varian settlement, as they did not consent to it and did not control its negotiation or agreement.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment