Global Trader Europe Ltd, Re [2009] EWHC 602 (Ch) (24 March 2009)
Only sums actually segregated in the client money account at the time of administration are held on trust for the Crawford-Brunt class; incomplete transfers and post-administration credits do not attract trust protection and are unsecured claims. Rossib and Soukholinski classes do not have proprietary claims over general funds as their monies were not segregated and the opt-out from client money rules was ineffective, but absent tracing, their remedy is as unsecured creditors. The CFM class is correct that general funds are not subject to proprietary claims by other classes.
- Citation
- [2009] EWHC 602 (Ch)
- Parties
- Applicant (liquidator): Joanne Milner; Applicant (liquidator): Stephen Cork; First Respondent (representative of Crawford Brunt Class): Andre Crawford-Brunt; Second Respondent (representative of Rossib Class): Rossib (Cyprus) Limited; Third Respondent (representative of Soukholinski Class): Sergey Soukholinsky; Fourth Respondent (representative of CFM Class): City Facilities Management Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 March 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Insolvency Application Under Insolvency Act 1986, S.112 / Judgment on Liquidators' Application for Directions Regarding Distribution of Client Money and Creditor Claims
- Outcome
- Application determined with directions; proprietary claims by Rossib and Soukholinski classes rejected; trust protection limited to segregated funds for Crawford-Brunt class; other claims rank as unsecured.
- Legal Topics
- Client Money Rules, Statutory Trust, Distribution of Assets in Liquidation, Classification of Clients, Proprietary Claims Vs Unsecured Creditor Claims, Regulatory Compliance (fsa/cass)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joanne Milner
Applicant (liquidator)
Stephen Cork
Applicant (liquidator)
Andre Crawford-Brunt
First Respondent (representative of Crawford Brunt Class)
Rossib (Cyprus) Limited
Second Respondent (representative of Rossib Class)
Sergey Soukholinsky
Third Respondent (representative of Soukholinski Class)
City Facilities Management Limited
Fourth Respondent (representative of CFM Class)
Procedural Posture
Insolvency Application Under Insolvency Act 1986, S.112 / Judgment on Liquidators' Application for Directions Regarding Distribution of Client Money and Creditor Claims
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether sums held in segregated accounts are held on trust for specific classes of clients or all clients
- 2 Whether incomplete transfers to segregated accounts prior to administration confer trust protection or only unsecured creditor status
- 3 Whether post-administration credits to client accounts are subject to trust protection
Ratio Decidendi
Only sums actually segregated in the client money account at the time of administration are held on trust for the Crawford-Brunt class; incomplete transfers and post-administration credits do not attract trust protection and are unsecured claims. Rossib and Soukholinski classes do not have proprietary claims over general funds as their monies were not segregated and the opt-out from client money rules was ineffective, but absent tracing, their remedy is as unsecured creditors. The CFM class is correct that general funds are not subject to proprietary claims by other classes.
Court Disposition
Application determined with directions; proprietary claims by Rossib and Soukholinski classes rejected; trust protection limited to segregated funds for Crawford-Brunt class; other claims rank as unsecured.
Orders
- Liquidators to distribute segregated account funds solely to Crawford-Brunt class.
- No order for transfer of £503,157.55 to segregated account; claim ranks as unsecured.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment