Macaulay v Karim & Anor [2017] EWHC 1795 (QB) (14 July 2017)

Macaulay v Karim & Anor [2017] EWHC 1795 (QB) (14 July 2017)

The court found that the hospital (Croydon Health Services NHS Trust) failed to carry out basic investigations and did not appreciate the seriousness of the claimant's condition, which amounted to a breach of duty. The court also found that Dr Karim did not breach his duty of care. On causation, the court held that earlier intervention by the hospital would have prevented or reduced the extent of the claimant's injuries. Judgment was entered for the claimant against the hospital trust, but not against Dr Karim.

Citation
[2017] EWHC 1795 (QB)
Parties
Claimant: Ibiyinka Macaulay; 1st Defendant: Dr Abdul Karim; 2nd Defendant: Croydon Health Services NHS Trust
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
14 July 2017
Procedural Posture
Clinical Negligence Claim / High Court Trial, Judgment
Outcome
Claim against Croydon Health Services NHS Trust succeeded; claim against Dr Abdul Karim dismissed.
Legal Topics
Clinical Negligence, Standard of Care, Causation, Damages, Expert Evidence
Tort Law Medical Negligence Clinical Negligence Standard of Care Causation Damages Expert Evidence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ibiyinka Macaulay

Claimant

Dr Abdul Karim

1st Defendant

Croydon Health Services NHS Trust

2nd Defendant

Procedural Posture

Clinical Negligence Claim / High Court Trial, Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Dr Abdul Karim and/or Croydon Health Services NHS Trust were negligent in failing to diagnose and treat the claimant's underlying condition in a timely manner
  2. 2 Whether earlier intervention would have prevented or reduced the claimant's injuries
  3. 3 Whether the standard of care provided met the requirements of law

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the hospital (Croydon Health Services NHS Trust) failed to carry out basic investigations and did not appreciate the seriousness of the claimant's condition, which amounted to a breach of duty. The court also found that Dr Karim did not breach his duty of care. On causation, the court held that earlier intervention by the hospital would have prevented or reduced the extent of the claimant's injuries. Judgment was entered for the claimant against the hospital trust, but not against Dr Karim.

Court Disposition

Claim against Croydon Health Services NHS Trust succeeded; claim against Dr Abdul Karim dismissed.

Orders

  • Judgment for the claimant against Croydon Health Services NHS Trust.
  • Claim against Dr Abdul Karim dismissed.