Ministry of Justice v Carter
The appeal was allowed because the trial judge failed to apply the correct legal test for breach of duty in clinical negligence. There was a responsible body of medical opinion supporting the decision not to refer Ms Carter for specialist investigation, and the judge did not find that this opinion was illogical or unreasonable. Therefore, no breach of duty was established.
- Parties
- Appellant/defendant: Ministry of Justice; Respondent/claimant: Cheryl Carter
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 June 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment on Liability in Clinical Negligence
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; finding of breach of duty set aside
- Legal Topics
- Clinical Negligence, Standard of Care, Medical Referral Practice, Appellate Review
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ministry of Justice
Appellant/defendant
Cheryl Carter
Respondent/claimant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment on Liability in Clinical Negligence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the failure by Dr Premaratne to refer Ms Carter to a breast clinic after her third complaint constituted a breach of duty under the standard of care in clinical negligence
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was allowed because the trial judge failed to apply the correct legal test for breach of duty in clinical negligence. There was a responsible body of medical opinion supporting the decision not to refer Ms Carter for specialist investigation, and the judge did not find that this opinion was illogical or unreasonable. Therefore, no breach of duty was established.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; finding of breach of duty set aside
Orders
- Judgment for the Ministry of Justice
- No finding of breach of duty against Dr Premaratne
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment