McGartland & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] EWCA Civ 686 (14 July 2015)
The Court of Appeal held that the judge was entitled to make a section 6 declaration permitting closed material applications without first determining the Secretary of State's entitlement to rely on the NCND policy. The statutory framework allows for such a declaration where the conditions are met, and the court's ongoing duty to review the declaration provides adequate safeguards. The claimants' application regarding NCND could properly be considered as part of the section 6 proceedings, and the judge's approach was within his discretion.
- Citation
- [2015] EWCA Civ 686
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Martin McGartland; Claimant/appellant: Joanne Asher; Defendant/respondent: Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 July 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Closed Material Procedure, Neither Confirm Nor Deny Policy (ncnd), Justice and Security Act 2013, Disclosure, Open Justice, Public Interest Immunity
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Martin McGartland
Claimant/appellant
Joanne Asher
Claimant/appellant
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should have determined the Secretary of State's entitlement to rely on the NCND policy before making a section 6 declaration under the Justice and Security Act 2013
- 2 Whether the conditions for a section 6 declaration permitting closed material applications were met
- 3 Whether a closed material procedure was justified in the circumstances of the case
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal held that the judge was entitled to make a section 6 declaration permitting closed material applications without first determining the Secretary of State's entitlement to rely on the NCND policy. The statutory framework allows for such a declaration where the conditions are met, and the court's ongoing duty to review the declaration provides adequate safeguards. The claimants' application regarding NCND could properly be considered as part of the section 6 proceedings, and the judge's approach was within his discretion.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Section 6 declaration permitting closed material applications upheld
- Claimants' application for an order requiring a full open defence dismissed, without prejudice to renewal after further case management steps
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment