Rashid v Munir & Ors [2018] EWHC 1258 (QB) (22 May 2018)
The judge found that the common intention of the parties was that the claimant was not entitled to a share of the rental income, and there was no credible evidence to the contrary. The legal presumption that equity follows the law was not displaced by the facts.
- Citation
- [2018] EWHC 1258
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Mr Abdulaziz Rashid; Defendant/respondent: Mohammed Munir; Defendant/respondent: Mohammed Khalil; Defendant/respondent: Abdul Hafeez Rashid; Third Party: Naheema Kosar Najib; Fourth Party: Begum Jan
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 May 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From First Instance
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Co Ownership, Beneficial Interest, Equitable Accounting, Distribution of Rental Income
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Abdulaziz Rashid
Claimant/appellant
Mohammed Munir
Defendant/respondent
Mohammed Khalil
Defendant/respondent
Abdul Hafeez Rashid
Defendant/respondent
Naheema Kosar Najib
Third Party
Begum Jan
Fourth Party
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From First Instance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to a share of rental payments from jointly owned properties
Ratio Decidendi
The judge found that the common intention of the parties was that the claimant was not entitled to a share of the rental income, and there was no credible evidence to the contrary. The legal presumption that equity follows the law was not displaced by the facts.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The claimant is not entitled to a share of the commercial rents generated from the properties.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment