Bloomberg LP v Malling Pre-Cast Ltd [2015] EWHC 2858 (TCC) (16 October 2015)
Clause 6 of the Malling Warranty operates as a procedural bar to Bloomberg's enforcement of its rights after the cut-off date, not as an extinguishment of the underlying substantive right. Therefore, Malling cannot rely on the proviso in section 1(3) of the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978 to bar contribution proceedings by Sandberg. Summary judgment and strike-out are refused.
- Citation
- [2015] EWHC 2858 (TCC)
- Parties
- Claimant: Bloomberg LP; First Defendant: Sandberg (a firm); Second Defendant: Sandberg LLP; Third Defendant: Buro Happold Limited; Third Party: Malling Pre-Cast Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 October 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Construction Dispute / Summary Judgment Application (part 20 Proceedings)
- Outcome
- Application for summary judgment and strike-out refused
- Legal Topics
- Collateral Warranty, Limitation Period, Contribution Proceedings, Civil Liability (contribution) Act 1978, Procedural Vs Substantive Bar
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bloomberg LP
Claimant
Sandberg (a firm)
First Defendant
Sandberg LLP
Second Defendant
Buro Happold Limited
Third Defendant
Malling Pre-Cast Limited
Third Party
Procedural Posture
Commercial Construction Dispute / Summary Judgment Application (part 20 Proceedings)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether clause 6 of the Malling Warranty bars contribution proceedings by other parties
- 2 Whether the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978 applies to Malling
- 3 Whether the limitation clause extinguishes or merely bars Bloomberg's underlying right
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 6 of the Malling Warranty operates as a procedural bar to Bloomberg's enforcement of its rights after the cut-off date, not as an extinguishment of the underlying substantive right. Therefore, Malling cannot rely on the proviso in section 1(3) of the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978 to bar contribution proceedings by Sandberg. Summary judgment and strike-out are refused.
Court Disposition
Application for summary judgment and strike-out refused
Orders
- Malling's application for summary judgment and strike-out of Part 20 proceedings is dismissed
- No declaration granted regarding contribution for damage after 28 August 2012
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment