Swansea Stadium Management Company Ltd v City & County of Swansea & Anor
The Collateral Warranty was intended to have retrospective effect, making the cause of action accrue at practical completion (31 March 2005); the Original Construction Claims are statute-barred as proceedings were issued after the 12-year limitation period.
- Parties
- Claimant: Swansea Stadium Management Company Limited; First Defendant: City & County of Swansea; Second Defendant: Interserve Construction Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 August 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Summary Judgment Application
- Outcome
- Summary judgment granted in favour of Second Defendant on Original Construction Claims; paragraphs struck out; Claimant's claims confined to Clause 16 Claims.
- Legal Topics
- Collateral Warranty, Limitation Period, Practical Completion, Defects Liability, Summary Judgment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Swansea Stadium Management Company Limited
Claimant
City & County of Swansea
First Defendant
Interserve Construction Limited
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Summary Judgment Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Collateral Warranty has retrospective effect
- 2 When the cause of action accrued for limitation purposes
- 3 Whether practical completion occurred on 31 March 2005
Ratio Decidendi
The Collateral Warranty was intended to have retrospective effect, making the cause of action accrue at practical completion (31 March 2005); the Original Construction Claims are statute-barred as proceedings were issued after the 12-year limitation period.
Court Disposition
Summary judgment granted in favour of Second Defendant on Original Construction Claims; paragraphs struck out; Claimant's claims confined to Clause 16 Claims.
Orders
- Summary judgment in favour of Second Defendant on claims in paragraphs 89(1) to (5) and 93(1) to (4) of Particulars of Claim; those paragraphs struck out.
- Claimant’s claims in paragraphs 103-105 of Particulars of Claim confined to breaches alleged in paragraphs 89(6) and 93(5).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment