Regent Wealth Ltd & Ors v Wiggins [2014] EWCA Civ 1078 (30 July 2014)
The statutory scheme of the 1993 Act requires that leasehold interests to be acquired must exist at the relevant date; the court does not have power to permit amendment of the initial notice to include leases created after the relevant date; paragraph 15 of Schedule 3 does not allow such amendment; valuation provisions cannot apply to interests not in existence at the relevant date; failure to register the initial notice means new leases take free of the collective enfranchisement claim.
- Citation
- [2014] EWCA Civ 1078
- Parties
- Defendant / Appellant: Regent Wealth Limited; Defendant / Appellant: Silver Gardens Investment Limited; Defendant / Appellant: Garden Bay Holdings Limited; Claimant / Respondent: Nigel Charles Wiggins
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 July 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Collective Enfranchisement, Leasehold Reform, Amendment of Initial Notice, Land Registration, Priority of Interests
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regent Wealth Limited
Defendant / Appellant
Silver Gardens Investment Limited
Defendant / Appellant
Garden Bay Holdings Limited
Defendant / Appellant
Nigel Charles Wiggins
Claimant / Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judge had power under paragraph 15 of Schedule 3 to the 1993 Act to allow amendment of the Initial Notice to claim leases not in existence at the relevant date
- 2 Whether participating tenants are entitled to claim leases falling within section 2 which exist at the relevant date only
- 3 Whether the Companies, as lessees of the New Leases, took free of the collective enfranchisement claim due to non-registration of the Initial Notice
Ratio Decidendi
The statutory scheme of the 1993 Act requires that leasehold interests to be acquired must exist at the relevant date; the court does not have power to permit amendment of the initial notice to include leases created after the relevant date; paragraph 15 of Schedule 3 does not allow such amendment; valuation provisions cannot apply to interests not in existence at the relevant date; failure to register the initial notice means new leases take free of the collective enfranchisement claim.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Order of Mr Recorder Kent QC permitting amendment of the Initial Notice to include the New Leases set aside
- Companies' counterclaim seeking declaration that they took free from the Initial Notice allowed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment