Merricks v Mastercard Incorporated & Ors [2018] EWCA Civ 2527 (13 November 2018)
The Court of Appeal has jurisdiction to hear an appeal on a point of law from a Competition Appeal Tribunal decision refusing to make a Collective Proceedings Order (CPO), as such a refusal is a decision as to the award of damages within the meaning of s.49(1A)(a) of the Competition Act 1998, because it denies the unique remedy of an aggregate award of damages available only in collective proceedings.
- Citation
- [2018] EWCA Civ 2527
- Parties
- Appellant/applicant: Walter Hugh Merricks CBE; Respondent/interested Party: Mastercard Incorporated; Respondent/interested Party: Mastercard International Incorporated; Respondent/interested Party: Mastercard Europe S. P. R. L; Respondent (judicial Review): The Competition Appeal Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 November 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal and Judicial Review / Jurisdictional Preliminary Issue on Right of Appeal From Refusal of Collective Proceedings Order (cpo)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed on jurisdictional issue; Court of Appeal has jurisdiction to hear the appeal on a point of law from the refusal of a CPO.
- Legal Topics
- Collective Proceedings, Class Actions, Jurisdiction, Appeals, Consumer Rights Act 2015, Competition Act 1998, Aggregate Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Walter Hugh Merricks CBE
Appellant/applicant
Mastercard Incorporated
Respondent/interested Party
Mastercard International Incorporated
Respondent/interested Party
Mastercard Europe S. P. R. L
Respondent/interested Party
The Competition Appeal Tribunal
Respondent (judicial Review)
Procedural Posture
Appeal and Judicial Review / Jurisdictional Preliminary Issue on Right of Appeal From Refusal of Collective Proceedings Order (cpo)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court of Appeal has jurisdiction to hear an appeal on a point of law from a Competition Appeal Tribunal decision refusing a Collective Proceedings Order (CPO) under s.47B of the Competition Act 1998
- 2 Interpretation of s.49(1A) Competition Act 1998 as to 'decision as to the award of damages' in collective proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal has jurisdiction to hear an appeal on a point of law from a Competition Appeal Tribunal decision refusing to make a Collective Proceedings Order (CPO), as such a refusal is a decision as to the award of damages within the meaning of s.49(1A)(a) of the Competition Act 1998, because it denies the unique remedy of an aggregate award of damages available only in collective proceedings.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed on jurisdictional issue; Court of Appeal has jurisdiction to hear the appeal on a point of law from the refusal of a CPO.
Orders
- Court of Appeal declares it has jurisdiction to hear the appeal on a point of law from the refusal of a Collective Proceedings Order (CPO) by the Competition Appeal Tribunal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment