Cavendish Square Holdings BV & Anor v El Makdessi [2012] EWHC 4305 (Comm) (18 December 2012)
Permission to issue committal proceedings for contempt is granted because there is a strong case that the Defendant knowingly made a false statement in his Defence and Counterclaim regarding his involvement with Carat after April/June 2008, the statement was significant to the proceedings, and the public interest requires that such conduct be addressed to uphold the integrity of the justice system.
- Citation
- [2012] EWHC 4305 (Comm)
- Parties
- Claimant / Part 20 Defendant: Cavendish Square Holdings B.V.; Claimant / Part 20 Defendant: Team Y&R Holdings Hong Kong Limited; Defendant / Part 20 Claimant: Talal El Makdessi; Part 20 Defendant: WPP 2005 Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 December 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Court Proceedings With Application for Permission to Issue Committal Proceedings for Contempt / Post Liability Judgment, Application for Permission to Issue Committal Proceedings
- Outcome
- Permission granted to the Claimants to issue committal proceedings for contempt against the Defendant.
- Legal Topics
- Committal for Contempt, False Statements, Statements of Truth, Costs, Disclosure, Fiduciary Duty, Restrictive Covenants
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cavendish Square Holdings B.V.
Claimant / Part 20 Defendant
Team Y&R Holdings Hong Kong Limited
Claimant / Part 20 Defendant
Talal El Makdessi
Defendant / Part 20 Claimant
WPP 2005 Limited
Part 20 Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Proceedings With Application for Permission to Issue Committal Proceedings for Contempt / Post Liability Judgment, Application for Permission to Issue Committal Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether permission should be granted to the Claimants to issue committal proceedings for contempt against the Defendant for making false statements verified by a statement of truth in pleadings
- 2 Whether the Defendant knowingly made false statements in his Defence and Counterclaim
- 3 Whether the public interest requires committal proceedings to be brought
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to issue committal proceedings for contempt is granted because there is a strong case that the Defendant knowingly made a false statement in his Defence and Counterclaim regarding his involvement with Carat after April/June 2008, the statement was significant to the proceedings, and the public interest requires that such conduct be addressed to uphold the integrity of the justice system.
Court Disposition
Permission granted to the Claimants to issue committal proceedings for contempt against the Defendant.
Orders
- Permission to issue committal proceedings for contempt granted.
- Claimants may proceed with committal application against Defendant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment