Bristol & West Investments Plc v Tompkins [2006] EWCA Civ 977 (26 June 2006)
The appeal was dismissed because Mr Tompkins had flagrantly and persistently refused to comply with the court's order to remove livestock from the land, and there was no practical likelihood of compliance without enforcement of the committal order.
- Citation
- [2006] EWCA Civ 977
- Parties
- Respondent/claimant: Bristol & West Investments PLC; Appellant/first Defendant: Bryan Henry Tompkins
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 June 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Committal Order for Contempt
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Committal for Contempt, Enforcement of Possession Orders, Mortgage Possession Proceedings, Non Compliance With Court Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bristol & West Investments PLC
Respondent/claimant
Bryan Henry Tompkins
Appellant/first Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Committal Order for Contempt
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the committal order for contempt was properly made against Mr Tompkins for failing to comply with a court order to remove livestock from mortgaged land
- 2 Whether there were grounds to set aside or stay the committal order
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because Mr Tompkins had flagrantly and persistently refused to comply with the court's order to remove livestock from the land, and there was no practical likelihood of compliance without enforcement of the committal order.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Order of committal for contempt upheld
- Mr Tompkins to report to Oxford County Court for execution of committal order
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment