Advetec Holdings Ltd v Shaw & Anor [2020] EWHC 2660 (QB) (09 October 2020)
Permission to bring committal proceedings is granted because there is a strong prima facie case of false statements and breaches of injunction, and the case is exceptional such that the public interest requires committal proceedings to proceed in advance of trial. The application to amend the Particulars of Claim is allowed, with costs reserved. The Claimant is released from its undertaking to employ the First Defendant, and the related non-competition injunction is discharged as a corollary.
- Citation
- [2020] EWHC 2660 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Advetec Holdings Limited; First Defendant: Craig Andrew Shaw; Second Defendant: Green Gold Consulting Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 October 2020
- Procedural Posture
- High Court Civil (queen's Bench Division) / Interlocutory Application for Permission to Bring Committal Proceedings and Application to Amend Particulars of Claim
- Outcome
- Permission to bring committal proceedings granted; application to amend Particulars of Claim allowed; Claimant released from employment undertaking; related injunction discharged.
- Legal Topics
- Committal for Contempt, False Statements in Witness Evidence, Breach of Injunction, Amendment of Pleadings, Employment Fiduciary Duties, Confidential Information
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Advetec Holdings Limited
Claimant
Craig Andrew Shaw
First Defendant
Green Gold Consulting Limited
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
High Court Civil (queen's Bench Division) / Interlocutory Application for Permission to Bring Committal Proceedings and Application to Amend Particulars of Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether permission should be granted to bring committal proceedings for contempt against the First Defendant for alleged false statements and breaches of injunction
- 2 Whether the application to amend the Particulars of Claim should be allowed
- 3 Whether the Claimant should be released from its undertaking to employ the First Defendant and the related injunction should be discharged
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to bring committal proceedings is granted because there is a strong prima facie case of false statements and breaches of injunction, and the case is exceptional such that the public interest requires committal proceedings to proceed in advance of trial. The application to amend the Particulars of Claim is allowed, with costs reserved. The Claimant is released from its undertaking to employ the First Defendant, and the related non-competition injunction is discharged as a corollary.
Court Disposition
Permission to bring committal proceedings granted; application to amend Particulars of Claim allowed; Claimant released from employment undertaking; related injunction discharged.
Orders
- Permission granted to bring committal proceedings against the First Defendant for contempt.
- Claimant granted leave to amend Particulars of Claim; costs of amendment reserved to trial judge.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment