Maldon District Council v Hammond

Maldon District Council v Hammond

The appeal was dismissed because the judge's findings of wilful and contumacious breach were justified, the period of suspension was appropriate, and no error was found in the exercise of discretion. The appellant had not sought alternative accommodation, and the council's undertaking addressed hardship. Subsequent events did not warrant interference with the order.

Parties
Claimant/respondent: Maldon District Council; Defendant/appellant: Michael Roy Hammond
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
07 July 2005
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment on Committal for Contempt
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Committal for Contempt, Injunction Enforcement, Planning Enforcement, Suspension of Committal Orders, Housing Rights

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Maldon District Council

Claimant/respondent

Michael Roy Hammond

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment on Committal for Contempt

  1. 1 Whether the period of suspension of committal should be extended
  2. 2 Whether the judge erred in finding wilful breach of injunction
  3. 3 Whether subsequent events justified variation of the committal order

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the judge's findings of wilful and contumacious breach were justified, the period of suspension was appropriate, and no error was found in the exercise of discretion. The appellant had not sought alternative accommodation, and the council's undertaking addressed hardship. Subsequent events did not warrant interference with the order.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Public funding assessment of the appellant's costs