Maldon District Council v Hammond
The appeal was dismissed because the judge's findings of wilful and contumacious breach were justified, the period of suspension was appropriate, and no error was found in the exercise of discretion. The appellant had not sought alternative accommodation, and the council's undertaking addressed hardship. Subsequent events did not warrant interference with the order.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Maldon District Council; Defendant/appellant: Michael Roy Hammond
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 July 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment on Committal for Contempt
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Committal for Contempt, Injunction Enforcement, Planning Enforcement, Suspension of Committal Orders, Housing Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Maldon District Council
Claimant/respondent
Michael Roy Hammond
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment on Committal for Contempt
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the period of suspension of committal should be extended
- 2 Whether the judge erred in finding wilful breach of injunction
- 3 Whether subsequent events justified variation of the committal order
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because the judge's findings of wilful and contumacious breach were justified, the period of suspension was appropriate, and no error was found in the exercise of discretion. The appellant had not sought alternative accommodation, and the council's undertaking addressed hardship. Subsequent events did not warrant interference with the order.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Public funding assessment of the appellant's costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment