Bristol & West Investments Plc v Tompkins
The appeal was dismissed because Mr Tompkins had persistent and flagrant defiance of court orders, had adequate notice and opportunity to comply, and no further practical steps could be taken to avoid the consequences of his non-compliance. The committal order was justified and must be enforced.
- Parties
- Respondent/claimant: Bristol & West Investments PLC; Appellant/first Defendant: Bryan Henry Tompkins
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 June 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Committal Order for Contempt
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Committal for Contempt, Enforcement of Possession Orders, Mortgage Possession, Non Compliance With Court Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bristol & West Investments PLC
Respondent/claimant
Bryan Henry Tompkins
Appellant/first Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Committal Order for Contempt
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the committal order for contempt should be upheld against Mr Tompkins for failure to comply with a possession order and removal of livestock
- 2 Whether Mr Tompkins had adequate notice and opportunity to comply with the court's orders
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because Mr Tompkins had persistent and flagrant defiance of court orders, had adequate notice and opportunity to comply, and no further practical steps could be taken to avoid the consequences of his non-compliance. The committal order was justified and must be enforced.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Order of committal for contempt upheld
- Mr Tompkins to report to Oxford County Court for execution of committal order
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment