[2013] EWHC 1365 (QB)
The period Mr. Edwards has been detained is sufficient to meet the penal element of the committal order. The court is satisfied that exposing Mr. Edwards to the risk of further imprisonment in the event of future breaches is the best way to secure compliance. Accordingly, the application to purge contempt and release Mr. Edwards is granted, with costs assessed against him.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Ladbrokes Betting and Gaming Limited; Defendant/applicant: Terence Edwards
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 April 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Contempt of Court Application / Application to Purge Contempt and for Release From Prison
- Outcome
- Application to purge contempt granted; Mr. Edwards released from prison; costs awarded against Mr. Edwards.
- Legal Topics
- Committal for Contempt, Suspended Committal Orders, Purging Contempt, Costs Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ladbrokes Betting and Gaming Limited
Claimant/respondent
Terence Edwards
Defendant/applicant
Procedural Posture
Civil Contempt of Court Application / Application to Purge Contempt and for Release From Prison
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr. Edwards has purged his contempt and should be released from prison
- 2 Appropriate assessment of costs for the application
Ratio Decidendi
The period Mr. Edwards has been detained is sufficient to meet the penal element of the committal order. The court is satisfied that exposing Mr. Edwards to the risk of further imprisonment in the event of future breaches is the best way to secure compliance. Accordingly, the application to purge contempt and release Mr. Edwards is granted, with costs assessed against him.
Court Disposition
Application to purge contempt granted; Mr. Edwards released from prison; costs awarded against Mr. Edwards.
Orders
- Mr. Edwards is released from prison, having purged his contempt.
- Mr. Edwards to pay the claimant's costs of the application, summarily assessed at £4,800.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment