Kleinhentz v Harrison & Anor

Kleinhentz v Harrison & Anor

There was no common intention or agreement for the claimant to have a beneficial interest in the properties. The 2011 Agreement is valid but payment is conditional on receipt of a gift or inheritance from the defendant's father after the agreement date, not triggered by sale proceeds. No variation or proprietary estoppel was established.

Parties
Claimant: Mr Thain-Michel Kleinhentz; First Defendant: Mr Mark Harrison; Second Defendant: Mr Craig Anthony White
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
15 December 2020
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment
Outcome
Claims dismissed
Legal Topics
Common Intention Constructive Trust, Proprietary Estoppel, Contract Interpretation, Beneficial Ownership, Variation of Contract
Property Law Trusts Law Contract Law Equity Common Intention Constructive Trust Proprietary Estoppel Contract Interpretation Beneficial Ownership +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr Thain-Michel Kleinhentz

Claimant

Mr Mark Harrison

First Defendant

Mr Craig Anthony White

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant had a beneficial interest in Comeragh Road and Margravine Gardens
  2. 2 Interpretation and enforceability of the 2011 Agreement
  3. 3 Whether the 2011 Agreement was varied to trigger payment upon sale proceeds

Ratio Decidendi

There was no common intention or agreement for the claimant to have a beneficial interest in the properties. The 2011 Agreement is valid but payment is conditional on receipt of a gift or inheritance from the defendant's father after the agreement date, not triggered by sale proceeds. No variation or proprietary estoppel was established.

Court Disposition

Claims dismissed

Orders

  • The claimant's claims against both defendants are dismissed in their entirety.