Green Lane Products Ltd v PMS International Group Plc & Ors
The Court held that 'the sector concerned' in Article 7 of Regulation 6/2002 means the sector of the alleged prior art, not the sector for which the design was registered. Therefore, prior art from any sector can be cited against a registered design unless it was so obscure that it could not reasonably have become known to circles specialised in its own sector within the Community. The indication of intended products in the application is administrative and does not limit the scope of protection or the relevant prior art. The appeal was dismissed.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Green Lane Products Limited; Defendant/respondent: PMS International Group plc; Defendant/respondent: PMS International Far East Limited; Defendant/respondent: Poundland Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 April 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (patents Court) on Preliminary Point of Law
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Community Registered Designs, Novelty, Prior Art, Interpretation of Regulation 6/2002, Scope of Protection
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Green Lane Products Limited
Claimant/appellant
PMS International Group plc
Defendant/respondent
PMS International Far East Limited
Defendant/respondent
Poundland Limited
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (patents Court) on Preliminary Point of Law
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the correct legal meaning of 'the circles specialised in the sector concerned operating within the Community' in Article 7 of Regulation 6/2002?
- 2 Does the 'sector concerned' refer to the sector of the registered design or the sector of the alleged prior art?
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that 'the sector concerned' in Article 7 of Regulation 6/2002 means the sector of the alleged prior art, not the sector for which the design was registered. Therefore, prior art from any sector can be cited against a registered design unless it was so obscure that it could not reasonably have become known to circles specialised in its own sector within the Community. The indication of intended products in the application is administrative and does not limit the scope of protection or the relevant prior art. The appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment