Maier & Anor v Asos Plc & Anor [2015] EWCA Civ 220 (01 April 2015)
The Court of Appeal upheld the judge's approach to limiting the CTM specification to specialist clothing for cyclists and specific casual wear items (track-suits, t-shirts, polo shirts, shorts, caps, jackets), but broadened the specification to include specialist clothing for cyclists generally, not just racing cyclists. The court found no error in the judge's rejection of infringement under Article 9(1)(b) and 9(1)(c), as there was no likelihood of confusion between the marks, and no evidence of detriment to the distinctive character or repute of the CTM. The challenge to the validity of the UK trade mark for ASOS also failed, as there was no likelihood of confusion or unfair...
- Citation
- [2015] EWCA Civ 220
- Parties
- Appellant/claimant: Roger Maier; Appellant/claimant: Assos of Switzerland SA; Respondent/defendant: ASOS plc; Respondent/defendant: ASOS.com Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 April 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From High Court (chancery Division, Intellectual Property, Community Trade Mark Court) / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed in substance; specification of CTM slightly broadened as to 'specialist clothing for cyclists' instead of 'racing cyclists'; otherwise, High Court's orders affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Community Trade Mark, Revocation for Non Use, Likelihood of Confusion, Passing Off, Own Name Defence, Specification Limitation, Invalidity of Trade Mark
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Roger Maier
Appellant/claimant
Assos of Switzerland SA
Appellant/claimant
ASOS plc
Respondent/defendant
ASOS.com Limited
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal From High Court (chancery Division, Intellectual Property, Community Trade Mark Court) / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Community Trade Mark (CTM) for ASSOS should be partially revoked for non-use and to what extent
- 2 Whether ASOS's use of its sign infringed the CTM under Article 9(1)(b) and 9(1)(c) of the Regulation
- 3 Whether there was a likelihood of confusion between the marks
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal upheld the judge's approach to limiting the CTM specification to specialist clothing for cyclists and specific casual wear items (track-suits, t-shirts, polo shirts, shorts, caps, jackets), but broadened the specification to include specialist clothing for cyclists generally, not just racing cyclists. The court found no error in the judge's rejection of infringement under Article 9(1)(b) and 9(1)(c), as there was no likelihood of confusion between the marks, and no evidence of detriment to the distinctive character or repute of the CTM. The challenge to the validity of the UK trade mark for ASOS also failed, as there was no likelihood of confusion or unfair...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed in substance; specification of CTM slightly broadened as to 'specialist clothing for cyclists' instead of 'racing cyclists'; otherwise, High Court's orders affirmed.
Orders
- CTM specification limited to: specialist clothing for cyclists; track-suits, t-shirts, polo shirts, shorts, caps, jackets.
- Partial revocation of CTM outside those goods effective from 17 January 2012.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment