Halifax Plc & Ors v Halifax Repossessions Ltd & Ors [2004] EWCA Civ 331 (02 February 2004)
The court cannot order a change of company name otherwise than by special resolution in accordance with section 28(1) of the Companies Act 1985; Order 45 Rule 8 does not empower the court to bypass statutory requirements; the Registrar of Companies cannot be compelled by court order to act outside statutory powers; therefore, the orders made by Patten J and Lightman J were invalid and must be set aside.
- Citation
- [2004] EWCA Civ 331
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Halifax PLC; Claimant/respondent: Halifax Mortgage Services Ltd; Claimant/respondent: Halifax Loans Ltd; Claimant/respondent: Halifax Asset Finance Ltd; Claimant/respondent: Halifax Leasing (March) Ltd; Claimant/respondent: Halifax Leasing (June) Ltd; Claimant/respondent: Halifax Leasing (September) Ltd; Defendant/appellant: Halifax Repossessions Ltd; Defendant/appellant: Halifax Second Mortgages Ltd; Defendant/appellant: Halifax Business Finance Ltd; Defendant/appellant: Dharam Prakash Gopee
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 February 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Company Name Change, Court Powers Under Order 45 Rule 8, Statutory Procedure for Company Name Change, Registrar of Companies' Powers, Costs Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Halifax PLC
Claimant/respondent
Halifax Mortgage Services Ltd
Claimant/respondent
Halifax Loans Ltd
Claimant/respondent
Halifax Asset Finance Ltd
Claimant/respondent
Halifax Leasing (March) Ltd
Claimant/respondent
Halifax Leasing (June) Ltd
Claimant/respondent
Halifax Leasing (September) Ltd
Claimant/respondent
Halifax Repossessions Ltd
Defendant/appellant
Halifax Second Mortgages Ltd
Defendant/appellant
Halifax Business Finance Ltd
Defendant/appellant
Dharam Prakash Gopee
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court can order a change of company name otherwise than by special resolution under Companies Act 1985 section 28(1)
- 2 Whether Order 45 Rule 8 empowers the court to authorise a person to change a company's name outside statutory procedure
- 3 Whether the Registrar of Companies can be ordered by the court to change a company's name absent statutory authority
Ratio Decidendi
The court cannot order a change of company name otherwise than by special resolution in accordance with section 28(1) of the Companies Act 1985; Order 45 Rule 8 does not empower the court to bypass statutory requirements; the Registrar of Companies cannot be compelled by court order to act outside statutory powers; therefore, the orders made by Patten J and Lightman J were invalid and must be set aside.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Order of Patten J of 29 May 2002 set aside
- Costs order of Lightman J of 14 January 2003 set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment