Telegraph Service Stations Ltd v Trafford Borough Council & Anor [2000] EWLands ACQ_163_1996 (24 May 2000)
The Tribunal determined compensation based on a three-year average throughput (1991 adjusted, 1992, 1993), with a 7.5% reduction for risk of competition from a new planning permission and a 30% reduction for the claimant's pricing policy. The capital value method was preferred, using local comparables, and the Tribunal found the property would have attracted a major oil company as purchaser. Redevelopment was not commercially viable at the valuation date. Accountancy evidence did not materially affect the outcome. Compensation was set at £1,753,375 plus disturbance and costs.
- Citation
- [2000] EWLands ACQ_163_1996
- Parties
- Claimant: Telegraph Service Stations Limited; Acquiring Authority: Trafford Borough Council; Acquiring Authority (successor to Trafford Park Development Corporation): The Commission for the New Towns (North)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 May 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Compulsory Purchase Compensation Reference / Final Determination and Costs Order
- Outcome
- Compensation awarded to claimant; costs and interest ordered against acquiring authorities.
- Legal Topics
- Compensation Assessment, Valuation Methodology, Disturbance Compensation, Interest on Compensation, Costs in Tribunal Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Telegraph Service Stations Limited
Claimant
Trafford Borough Council
Acquiring Authority
The Commission for the New Towns (North)
Acquiring Authority (successor to Trafford Park Development Corporation)
Procedural Posture
Compulsory Purchase Compensation Reference / Final Determination and Costs Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Which years should be used to determine actual throughput for valuation?
- 2 What reduction should be applied for planning permission for a competing station?
- 3 What reduction should be applied for the claimant's pricing policy?
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal determined compensation based on a three-year average throughput (1991 adjusted, 1992, 1993), with a 7.5% reduction for risk of competition from a new planning permission and a 30% reduction for the claimant's pricing policy. The capital value method was preferred, using local comparables, and the Tribunal found the property would have attracted a major oil company as purchaser. Redevelopment was not commercially viable at the valuation date. Accountancy evidence did not materially affect the outcome. Compensation was set at £1,753,375 plus disturbance and costs.
Court Disposition
Compensation awarded to claimant; costs and interest ordered against acquiring authorities.
Orders
- Acquiring authorities to pay compensation of £1,753,375 to claimant.
- Acquiring authorities to pay disturbance compensation of £20,000.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment