Rehman & Ors v City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council [2001] EWLands ACQ_164_2000 (15 August 2001)

Rehman & Ors v City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council [2001] EWLands ACQ_164_2000 (15 August 2001)

The Tribunal accepted the claimants' valuer's figures, finding the Council's comparables unreliable due to distance, time, and compulsory purchase context. The only reliable comparable was the settlement for 4 Clifton Street, an adjoining property, which was properly adjusted for site area and condition. Rights of way were only established for 234 Manningham Lane. Costs were awarded to the claimants on the standard basis due to the Council's unreasonable undervaluation and the Tribunal's acceptance of the claimants' figures.

Citation
[2001] EWLands ACQ_164_2000
Parties
Claimants: Rehman & Others; Acquiring Authority: City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
15 August 2001
Procedural Posture
Compensation for Compulsory Acquisition / Final Determination of Compensation and Costs
Outcome
Compensation awarded to claimants at claimed figures; costs awarded to claimants on standard basis.
Legal Topics
Compensation Assessment, Valuation of Derelict Property, Rights of Way, Costs in Compulsory Purchase Proceedings
Compulsory Purchase Land Law Compensation Assessment Valuation of Derelict Property Rights of Way Costs in Compulsory Purchase Proceedings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rehman & Others

Claimants

City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council

Acquiring Authority

Procedural Posture

Compensation for Compulsory Acquisition / Final Determination of Compensation and Costs

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Proper valuation method for derelict properties acquired compulsorily
  2. 2 Admissibility and weight of comparables in compensation assessment
  3. 3 Effect of rights of way on value

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal accepted the claimants' valuer's figures, finding the Council's comparables unreliable due to distance, time, and compulsory purchase context. The only reliable comparable was the settlement for 4 Clifton Street, an adjoining property, which was properly adjusted for site area and condition. Rights of way were only established for 234 Manningham Lane. Costs were awarded to the claimants on the standard basis due to the Council's unreasonable undervaluation and the Tribunal's acceptance of the claimants' figures.

Court Disposition

Compensation awarded to claimants at claimed figures; costs awarded to claimants on standard basis.

Orders

  • Compensation for No.234: £19,500
  • Compensation for No.236: £17,500