Nomad Developments Ltd v Gateshead Borough Council [2004] EWLands ACQ_94_2002 (6 August 2004)
For compensation purposes, planning permission for residential development is to be assumed, subject to the conditions in the section 17 certificate, including retention and treatment of the tannery building. The certificate's conditions are not to be disregarded except where shown to be erroneous. The evidence does not support an assumption that listed building consent for demolition of the tannery would have been granted at the valuation date. The scale of development permitted would have allowed a substantial residential building along the north of the site, not limited to 2-3 storeys, and only a contribution (not full funding) to highway improvements would have been required.
- Citation
- [2004] EWLands ACQ_94_2002
- Parties
- Claimant: Nomad Developments Limited; Acquiring Authority: Gateshead Borough Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 August 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Compulsory Purchase Compensation / Decision on Preliminary Issue
- Outcome
- Preliminary issue determined: planning permission for residential development to be assumed, subject to section 17 certificate conditions including retention of the tannery; substantial residential building permitted; only contribution to highway improvements required.
- Legal Topics
- Compensation Assessment, Planning Assumptions, Listed Building Consent, Section 17 Certificate, Residential Development, Highway Contributions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nomad Developments Limited
Claimant
Gateshead Borough Council
Acquiring Authority
Procedural Posture
Compulsory Purchase Compensation / Decision on Preliminary Issue
Legal Issues
- 1 What planning assumptions should be made for compensation assessment under compulsory purchase?
- 2 Should listed building consent for demolition of the tannery be assumed?
- 3 What are the appropriate design, density, and highway requirements for residential development of the land?
Ratio Decidendi
For compensation purposes, planning permission for residential development is to be assumed, subject to the conditions in the section 17 certificate, including retention and treatment of the tannery building. The certificate's conditions are not to be disregarded except where shown to be erroneous. The evidence does not support an assumption that listed building consent for demolition of the tannery would have been granted at the valuation date. The scale of development permitted would have allowed a substantial residential building along the north of the site, not limited to 2-3 storeys, and only a contribution (not full funding) to highway improvements would have been required.
Court Disposition
Preliminary issue determined: planning permission for residential development to be assumed, subject to section 17 certificate conditions including retention of the tannery; substantial residential building permitted; only contribution to highway improvements required.
Orders
- Compensation to be assessed on basis of assumed planning permission for residential development with retention and treatment of tannery building, and contribution (not full funding) to highway improvements.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment