Tollgate Hotels Ltd v Secretary of State for Transport [2006] EWLands ACQ_45_2004 (01 June 2006)
Interest is payable on compensation for injurious affection under s.11(1) of the Compulsory Purchase Act 1965 when land is taken. The sealed offer was exclusive of interest. The claimant's delay in accepting the sealed offer beyond a reasonable period constituted unreasonable conduct, justifying an order that the claimant pay the authority's costs from the date of refusal to the date of acceptance.
- Citation
- [2006] EWLands ACQ_45_2004
- Parties
- Claimant: Tollgate Hotels Limited; Acquiring Authority: Secretary of State for Transport
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 June 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Compensation Costs Determination After Compulsory Purchase / Post Settlement Costs Determination Following Acceptance of Sealed Offer
- Outcome
- Costs order made: Authority to pay claimant's costs up to 2 November 2004; claimant to pay authority's costs from 3 November 2004 to 12 September 2005.
- Legal Topics
- Compensation for Injurious Affection, Costs Orders, Interest on Compensation, Interpretation of Sealed Offers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tollgate Hotels Limited
Claimant
Secretary of State for Transport
Acquiring Authority
Procedural Posture
Compensation Costs Determination After Compulsory Purchase / Post Settlement Costs Determination Following Acceptance of Sealed Offer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether interest is payable on compensation for injurious affection under s.11(1) of the Compulsory Purchase Act 1965
- 2 Whether the sealed offer included interest or was exclusive of interest
- 3 What is the proper order for costs following delayed acceptance of a sealed offer
Ratio Decidendi
Interest is payable on compensation for injurious affection under s.11(1) of the Compulsory Purchase Act 1965 when land is taken. The sealed offer was exclusive of interest. The claimant's delay in accepting the sealed offer beyond a reasonable period constituted unreasonable conduct, justifying an order that the claimant pay the authority's costs from the date of refusal to the date of acceptance.
Court Disposition
Costs order made: Authority to pay claimant's costs up to 2 November 2004; claimant to pay authority's costs from 3 November 2004 to 12 September 2005.
Orders
- Authority to pay claimant's costs up to 2 November 2004, to be assessed if not agreed.
- Claimant to pay authority's costs from 3 November 2004 to 12 September 2005, to be assessed if not agreed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment