Khan & Anor v Manchester City council [2006] EWLands ACQ_70_2006 (05 December 2006)
The Tribunal preferred the evidence of the acquiring authority, finding that the condition of the properties and the comparables within the same block justified a lower valuation. The conversion to flats did not warrant an uplift in value, and the claimants' comparables were unsuitable. Compensation was determined at £17,000 for 40 Louisa Street and £16,000 for 42 Louisa Street, plus agreed disturbance costs.
- Citation
- [2006] EWLands ACQ_70_2006
- Parties
- Claimant: Salim Khan; Claimant: Karen Khan; Acquiring Authority: Manchester City Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 December 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Compensation Compulsory Purchase / Determination of Compensation After Compulsory Acquisition
- Outcome
- Compensation awarded to claimants
- Legal Topics
- Compensation for Compulsory Acquisition, Valuation of Leasehold Interests, Disturbance Compensation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Salim Khan
Claimant
Karen Khan
Claimant
Manchester City Council
Acquiring Authority
Procedural Posture
Compensation Compulsory Purchase / Determination of Compensation After Compulsory Acquisition
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate compensation for the compulsory acquisition of the long leasehold interests in 40 and 42 Louisa Street, Openshaw, Manchester at the valuation date of 25 June 2004?
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal preferred the evidence of the acquiring authority, finding that the condition of the properties and the comparables within the same block justified a lower valuation. The conversion to flats did not warrant an uplift in value, and the claimants' comparables were unsuitable. Compensation was determined at £17,000 for 40 Louisa Street and £16,000 for 42 Louisa Street, plus agreed disturbance costs.
Court Disposition
Compensation awarded to claimants
Orders
- Manchester City Council to pay compensation of £33,500 to the claimants, inclusive of agreed disturbance costs.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment