Partridge Farms Ltd, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs
There was no unlawful discrimination in the Order. All owners of slaughtered cattle, including high value pedigree cattle, are treated equally under the table valuation system, which is based on objective criteria. The fact that some farmers are affected more than others does not render the scheme discriminatory or disproportionate. Even if there were discrimination, it would be objectively justified by the need to address overcompensation, ensure transparency, and protect public funds. The Order falls within the State's margin of appreciation and is not manifestly inappropriate.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Partridge Farms Limited; Defendant/appellant: Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 April 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From Administrative Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Compensation for Slaughtered Cattle, Principle of Equality in EU Law, State Aid and Agricultural Compensation, Judicial Review of Statutory Instruments
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Partridge Farms Limited
Claimant/respondent
Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From Administrative Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Cattle Compensation (England) Order 2006 breaches the principle of equality under European Community law by failing to provide adequate compensation for high value pedigree cattle slaughtered due to bovine TB
- 2 Whether the differential treatment of high value cattle owners is objectively justified
Ratio Decidendi
There was no unlawful discrimination in the Order. All owners of slaughtered cattle, including high value pedigree cattle, are treated equally under the table valuation system, which is based on objective criteria. The fact that some farmers are affected more than others does not render the scheme discriminatory or disproportionate. Even if there were discrimination, it would be objectively justified by the need to address overcompensation, ensure transparency, and protect public funds. The Order falls within the State's margin of appreciation and is not manifestly inappropriate.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Declaration of breach of equality principle set aside
- No special compensation for high value cattle required under the Order
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment