Partridge Farms Ltd, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs

Partridge Farms Ltd, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs

There was no unlawful discrimination in the Order. All owners of slaughtered cattle, including high value pedigree cattle, are treated equally under the table valuation system, which is based on objective criteria. The fact that some farmers are affected more than others does not render the scheme discriminatory or disproportionate. Even if there were discrimination, it would be objectively justified by the need to address overcompensation, ensure transparency, and protect public funds. The Order falls within the State's margin of appreciation and is not manifestly inappropriate.

Parties
Claimant/respondent: Partridge Farms Limited; Defendant/appellant: Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
01 April 2009
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From Administrative Court
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Compensation for Slaughtered Cattle, Principle of Equality in EU Law, State Aid and Agricultural Compensation, Judicial Review of Statutory Instruments

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 19 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Partridge Farms Limited

Claimant/respondent

Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From Administrative Court

  1. 1 Whether the Cattle Compensation (England) Order 2006 breaches the principle of equality under European Community law by failing to provide adequate compensation for high value pedigree cattle slaughtered due to bovine TB
  2. 2 Whether the differential treatment of high value cattle owners is objectively justified

Ratio Decidendi

There was no unlawful discrimination in the Order. All owners of slaughtered cattle, including high value pedigree cattle, are treated equally under the table valuation system, which is based on objective criteria. The fact that some farmers are affected more than others does not render the scheme discriminatory or disproportionate. Even if there were discrimination, it would be objectively justified by the need to address overcompensation, ensure transparency, and protect public funds. The Order falls within the State's margin of appreciation and is not manifestly inappropriate.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Declaration of breach of equality principle set aside
  • No special compensation for high value cattle required under the Order