Utilise TDS Ltd v Davies & Ors [2016] EWHC 2127 (Ch) (20 June 2016)
The compromise agreement between the claimant and Bolton College, containing an express release clause and no reservation of rights, operated to release the claims against all joint contractors, including the remaining defendants. No term reserving rights can be implied, as the agreement is clear, comprehensive, and commercially coherent without it, and the legal test for implication is not satisfied.
- Citation
- [2016] EWHC 2127 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Utilise TDS Limited; First Defendant: Neil Cranstoun Davies; Second Defendant: Bolton College; Third Defendant: Watertrain Limited; Fourth Defendant: Watertrain Acquisitions Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 June 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Chancery Division Civil Claim / Trial of Preliminary Issue
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Compromise Agreements, Release of Joint Contractors, Implied Terms, Trusts, Declaratory Relief
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Utilise TDS Limited
Claimant
Neil Cranstoun Davies
First Defendant
Bolton College
Second Defendant
Watertrain Limited
Third Defendant
Watertrain Acquisitions Limited
Fourth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Chancery Division Civil Claim / Trial of Preliminary Issue
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the compromise agreement between the claimant and Bolton College released claims against the other defendants
- 2 Whether a term reserving rights against other defendants should be implied into the compromise agreement
Ratio Decidendi
The compromise agreement between the claimant and Bolton College, containing an express release clause and no reservation of rights, operated to release the claims against all joint contractors, including the remaining defendants. No term reserving rights can be implied, as the agreement is clear, comprehensive, and commercially coherent without it, and the legal test for implication is not satisfied.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- The preliminary issue is determined in favour of the defendants.
- The claimant's claims against the first, third, and fourth defendants are dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment