Rehman & Ors v City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council [2001] EWLands ACQ_165_2000 (15 August 2001)

Rehman & Ors v City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council [2001] EWLands ACQ_165_2000 (15 August 2001)

The Tribunal accepted the claimants' valuer's figures as the most reliable evidence, finding the Council's comparables outdated and irrelevant. The settlement for 4 Clifton Street, an adjoining property, was the only valid comparable. Rights of way were only recognized for 234 Manningham Lane. Compensation was determined individually for each property. The claimants were awarded costs on the standard basis as special reasons existed not to apply the statutory cost-shifting provision.

Citation
[2001] EWLands ACQ_165_2000
Parties
Claimants: Rehman & Others; Acquiring Authority: City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
15 August 2001
Procedural Posture
Compulsory Acquisition Compensation Determination / Final Decision With Costs Addendum
Outcome
Compensation awarded to claimants; Council ordered to pay claimants' costs on the standard basis.
Legal Topics
Compulsory Acquisition, Compensation Assessment, Valuation of Derelict Property, Rights of Way, Costs in Tribunal Proceedings
Property Law Compulsory Purchase Land Compensation Compulsory Acquisition Compensation Assessment Valuation of Derelict Property Rights of Way Costs in Tribunal Proceedings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rehman & Others

Claimants

City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council

Acquiring Authority

Procedural Posture

Compulsory Acquisition Compensation Determination / Final Decision With Costs Addendum

Legal Issues

  1. 1 What is the appropriate compensation for the compulsory acquisition of derelict properties at 234, 236, 238 & 240 Manningham Lane, Bradford?
  2. 2 Should the properties be valued individually or as a combined site?
  3. 3 Do rights of way affect the valuation of the properties?

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal accepted the claimants' valuer's figures as the most reliable evidence, finding the Council's comparables outdated and irrelevant. The settlement for 4 Clifton Street, an adjoining property, was the only valid comparable. Rights of way were only recognized for 234 Manningham Lane. Compensation was determined individually for each property. The claimants were awarded costs on the standard basis as special reasons existed not to apply the statutory cost-shifting provision.

Court Disposition

Compensation awarded to claimants; Council ordered to pay claimants' costs on the standard basis.

Orders

  • Compensation for 234 Manningham Lane: £19,500
  • Compensation for 236 Manningham Lane: £17,500