Llanelec Precision Engineering Co Ltd v Neath Port Talbot County Borough Council [2000] EWLands ACQ_81_2000 (03 August 2000)
There was a binding and enforceable contract for compensation at £28,000 concluded in 1993, not subject to contract, and not requiring compliance with s 2 of the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989. The claim is therefore not open for further reference. Even if there was no contract, the claim would be statute-barred under Limitation Act 1980, s 9, and there is no estoppel preventing the acquiring authority from relying on limitation.
- Citation
- [2000] EWLands ACQ_81_2000
- Parties
- Claimant: Llanelec Precision Engineering Co Ltd; Acquiring Authority: Neath Port Talbot County Borough Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 August 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Compensation Claim for Compulsory Acquisition of Land (preliminary Issues) / Decision on Preliminary Issues Before the Lands Tribunal
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Compulsory Acquisition Compensation, Enforceability of Settlement Agreements, Limitation Act 1980, S 9, Estoppel by Convention, Law of Property (miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989, S 2, Promissory Estoppel, Waiver
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Llanelec Precision Engineering Co Ltd
Claimant
Neath Port Talbot County Borough Council
Acquiring Authority
Procedural Posture
Compensation Claim for Compulsory Acquisition of Land (preliminary Issues) / Decision on Preliminary Issues Before the Lands Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether compensation was already subject of a binding contract
- 2 Whether the claim is statute-barred under Limitation Act 1980, s 9
- 3 Whether the acquiring authority is estopped from relying on limitation
Ratio Decidendi
There was a binding and enforceable contract for compensation at £28,000 concluded in 1993, not subject to contract, and not requiring compliance with s 2 of the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989. The claim is therefore not open for further reference. Even if there was no contract, the claim would be statute-barred under Limitation Act 1980, s 9, and there is no estoppel preventing the acquiring authority from relying on limitation.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- Claim for compensation dismissed as already subject to a binding contract; no estoppel; no further compensation payable.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment