Estate of Dame Bernice Lake QC (Deceased) and another (Respondents) v Attorney General of Anguilla (Appellant) (Anguilla)
The Board of Assessment was entitled to value the 10 acre plot on a stand-alone basis for residential use, as the evidence did not support high-end tourism development as the highest and best use. The Court of Appeal erred in substituting its own valuation and method without proper evidentiary basis or notice to the parties. The Board of Assessment's findings on injurious affection were supported by evidence and not open to challenge on appeal, as there was no total prohibition on development in the approach zone.
- Parties
- Appellant/respondent: Estate of Dame Bernice Lake QC (Deceased); Appellant/respondent: Conch Bay Development Ltd; Respondent/appellant: Attorney General of Anguilla
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 August 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council on Appeal From the Court of Appeal of the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court (anguilla)
- Outcome
- Attorney General's appeal allowed; Lake appellant's appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Compulsory Acquisition of Land, Assessment of Compensation, Injurious Affection, Severance, Valuation Methods, Adequate Compensation Under Constitution
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Estate of Dame Bernice Lake QC (Deceased)
Appellant/respondent
Conch Bay Development Ltd
Appellant/respondent
Attorney General of Anguilla
Respondent/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council on Appeal From the Court of Appeal of the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court (anguilla)
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the proper method for assessing compensation for compulsory acquisition of land under the Land Acquisition Act (Anguilla) and the Constitution?
- 2 Is the Board of Assessment's approach to valuation of the acquired land and injurious affection lawful?
- 3 Was the Court of Appeal correct to substitute its own award and method of valuation?
Ratio Decidendi
The Board of Assessment was entitled to value the 10 acre plot on a stand-alone basis for residential use, as the evidence did not support high-end tourism development as the highest and best use. The Court of Appeal erred in substituting its own valuation and method without proper evidentiary basis or notice to the parties. The Board of Assessment's findings on injurious affection were supported by evidence and not open to challenge on appeal, as there was no total prohibition on development in the approach zone.
Court Disposition
Attorney General's appeal allowed; Lake appellant's appeal dismissed.
Orders
- The award of the Court of Appeal is set aside.
- The award of the Board of Assessment is restored.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment