Shinedean Ltd v Alldown Demolition (London) Ltd & Anor
The insured breached the condition precedent by failing to provide relevant information within a reasonable time, and the absence of actual prejudice to the insurer does not excuse the breach; the insurer was entitled to decline indemnity.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Shinedean Limited; Defendants/appellants: Alldown Demolition (London) Limited & Anr
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 June 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Queen’s Bench Division, Technology & Construction Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Condition Precedent, Reasonable Time for Compliance, Prejudice to Insurer, Provision of Information, Indemnity Under Insurance Policy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shinedean Limited
Claimant/respondent
Alldown Demolition (London) Limited & Anr
Defendants/appellants
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Queen’s Bench Division, Technology & Construction Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether actual prejudice to the insurer is material in determining breach of condition precedent to provide information within a reasonable time
- 2 Whether the insured breached the condition precedent by delayed provision of information
- 3 Whether the insurer was entitled to decline indemnity for late provision of information
Ratio Decidendi
The insured breached the condition precedent by failing to provide relevant information within a reasonable time, and the absence of actual prejudice to the insurer does not excuse the breach; the insurer was entitled to decline indemnity.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Appeal allowed; finding of breach of condition precedent reinstated; insurer entitled to decline indemnity.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment