Ungi v Liverpool City Council [2004] EWCA Civ 1617 (15 November 2004)
The appeal should proceed because it raises important points of practice regarding the calculation of success fees under conditional fee agreements, and the Court of Appeal should provide guidance on the interrelation of relevant provisions, notwithstanding the new arguments raised by the defendant.
- Citation
- [2004] EWCA Civ 1617
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Kelly Ungi; Defendant/appellant: Liverpool City Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 November 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application to Set Aside Permission to Appeal; Directions for Substantive Appeal
- Outcome
- Claimant's application to set aside permission to appeal refused; appeal to proceed with conditions.
- Legal Topics
- Conditional Fee Agreements, Success Fees, Costs Assessment, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kelly Ungi
Claimant/respondent
Liverpool City Council
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application to Set Aside Permission to Appeal; Directions for Substantive Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant can raise a new argument on appeal not raised below
- 2 Proper approach to assessing success fees under a conditional fee agreement
- 3 Interpretation of paragraphs 11.7 and 11.8(2) of the Costs Practice Direction
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal should proceed because it raises important points of practice regarding the calculation of success fees under conditional fee agreements, and the Court of Appeal should provide guidance on the interrelation of relevant provisions, notwithstanding the new arguments raised by the defendant.
Court Disposition
Claimant's application to set aside permission to appeal refused; appeal to proceed with conditions.
Orders
- Orders for costs in the courts below remain undisturbed.
- Defendant to pay claimant's costs in the Court of Appeal, limited to solicitor and junior counsel, sum to be agreed or determined by the court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment