Burton & Anor v Kingsley & Anor
The allowable uplift under the CFAs is 50% as the case was not straightforward but the risk did not justify a 100% uplift; costs are to be assessed on the standard basis as the defendants' conduct was not unreasonable or out of the norm.
- Parties
- Claimant: Anthony Burton; Claimant: Jennifer Haynes; First Defendant: Guy Kingsley; Second Defendant: Leonard Harper
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 May 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Personal Injury / Post Settlement, Determination of Costs Issues
- Outcome
- Claimants allowed a 50% uplift under CFAs; costs to be assessed on the standard basis; claim for indemnity costs and interest on costs rejected.
- Legal Topics
- Conditional Fee Agreements, Costs Assessment, Indemnity Costs, Success Fee Uplift
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anthony Burton
Claimant
Jennifer Haynes
Claimant
Guy Kingsley
First Defendant
Leonard Harper
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Personal Injury / Post Settlement, Determination of Costs Issues
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the reasonable percentage uplift under the CFAs?
- 2 Should costs be assessed on the indemnity basis?
- 3 Are the claimants entitled to interest on costs?
Ratio Decidendi
The allowable uplift under the CFAs is 50% as the case was not straightforward but the risk did not justify a 100% uplift; costs are to be assessed on the standard basis as the defendants' conduct was not unreasonable or out of the norm.
Court Disposition
Claimants allowed a 50% uplift under CFAs; costs to be assessed on the standard basis; claim for indemnity costs and interest on costs rejected.
Orders
- Claimants allowed a 50% uplift under their CFAs.
- Claimants' costs in relation to liability to be assessed on the standard basis.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment