OPQ v BJM & Anor [2011] EWHC 1059 (QB) (20 April 2011)

OPQ v BJM & Anor [2011] EWHC 1059 (QB) (20 April 2011)

The claimant and his family's Article 8 rights are engaged and outweigh any Article 10 rights of the defendants or third parties. There is a clear risk of publication, and no other means to protect those rights exists. Therefore, a contra mundum injunction is necessary and proportionate.

Citation
[2011] EWHC 1059 (QB)
Parties
Claimant: OPQ; First Defendant: BJM; Second Defendant: CJM
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
20 April 2011
Procedural Posture
Privacy Injunction / Blackmail / Confidentiality / Application for Contra Mundum Injunction Following Interim Injunction and Settlement
Outcome
Contra mundum injunction granted
Legal Topics
Confidentiality, Blackmail, Injunctions, Article 8 ECHR, Article 10 ECHR, Contra Mundum Orders

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 25 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

OPQ

Claimant

BJM

First Defendant

CJM

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Privacy Injunction / Blackmail / Confidentiality / Application for Contra Mundum Injunction Following Interim Injunction and Settlement

  1. 1 Whether a contra mundum injunction should be granted to protect the claimant's Article 8 rights after settlement and interim injunction
  2. 2 Whether the court has jurisdiction to grant an injunction against the world (contra mundum) in support of private law rights to confidentiality

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant and his family's Article 8 rights are engaged and outweigh any Article 10 rights of the defendants or third parties. There is a clear risk of publication, and no other means to protect those rights exists. Therefore, a contra mundum injunction is necessary and proportionate.

Court Disposition

Contra mundum injunction granted

Orders

  • Publication of any report as to the subject-matter of these proceedings or the identity of the Claimant is limited to what is contained in this judgment
  • Interim injunction remains in force until further order