Your Lawyers Ltd v Capital Interchange Ltd & Anor [2024] EWHC 287 (Ch) (23 February 2024)

Your Lawyers Ltd v Capital Interchange Ltd & Anor [2024] EWHC 287 (Ch) (23 February 2024)

The claims against both CIL and Therium raise triable issues of fact and law that are not precluded by prior findings in the HS Proceedings, and the pleadings are sufficient to proceed. The applications to strike out or summarily dismiss the claims are refused, subject to YLL providing further particulars of confidential information relied upon against Therium.

Citation
[2024] EWHC 287 (Ch)
Parties
Claimant: Your Lawyers Limited; First Defendant: Capital Interchange Limited; Second Defendant: Therium Capital Management Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
23 February 2024
Procedural Posture
Commercial Contract and Tort Claim / Strike Out and Summary Judgment Applications
Outcome
Applications to strike out and for summary judgment refused.
Legal Topics
Confidentiality Agreements, Breach of Contract, Breach of Confidence, Unlawful Means Conspiracy, Restitution, Summary Judgment, Strike Out Applications, Restraint of Trade
Commercial Law Contract Law Equity and Trusts Civil Procedure Confidentiality Agreements Breach of Contract Breach of Confidence Unlawful Means Conspiracy +4 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 19 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Your Lawyers Limited

Claimant

Capital Interchange Limited

First Defendant

Therium Capital Management Limited

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Contract and Tort Claim / Strike Out and Summary Judgment Applications

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claim against CIL for breach of confidentiality agreement should be struck out or summarily dismissed
  2. 2 Whether the claim against Therium for breach of confidence, unlawful means conspiracy, and restitution should be struck out or summarily dismissed
  3. 3 Whether the claims are an abuse of process or precluded by prior findings in related litigation

Ratio Decidendi

The claims against both CIL and Therium raise triable issues of fact and law that are not precluded by prior findings in the HS Proceedings, and the pleadings are sufficient to proceed. The applications to strike out or summarily dismiss the claims are refused, subject to YLL providing further particulars of confidential information relied upon against Therium.

Court Disposition

Applications to strike out and for summary judgment refused.

Orders

  • YLL to provide further particulars of confidential information relied upon against Therium.
  • Proceedings to continue to trial.