Lloyds TSB Bank Plc v Buswell & Anor [2002] EWCA Civ 1291 (16 May 2002)

Lloyds TSB Bank Plc v Buswell & Anor [2002] EWCA Civ 1291 (16 May 2002)

The court held that the compromise agreement was freely negotiated and binding, with no evidence of misrepresentation, undue influence, or procedural unfairness. The court has no jurisdiction to alter or refuse to approve a consent order embodying such an agreement, provided it is within the court's jurisdiction.

Citation
[2002] EWCA Civ 1291
Parties
Claimant/respondent: Lloyds TSB Bank Plc; First Defendant/applicant: Ronald John Buswell; Second Defendant: Rosemary Barbara Buswell
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
16 May 2002
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
Outcome
Application for permission to appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Consent Orders, Compromise Agreements, Possession Proceedings, Enforceability of Settlement, Jurisdiction of Court Over Consent Orders
Property Law Contract Law Civil Procedure Consent Orders Compromise Agreements Possession Proceedings Enforceability of Settlement Jurisdiction of Court Over Consent Orders

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lloyds TSB Bank Plc

Claimant/respondent

Ronald John Buswell

First Defendant/applicant

Rosemary Barbara Buswell

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the court can interfere with a consent order embodying a compromise agreement between parties
  2. 2 Whether the agreement was vitiated by misrepresentation, undue influence, or lack of legal advice
  3. 3 Whether the timetable and valuation method in the agreement rendered it unenforceable

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the compromise agreement was freely negotiated and binding, with no evidence of misrepresentation, undue influence, or procedural unfairness. The court has no jurisdiction to alter or refuse to approve a consent order embodying such an agreement, provided it is within the court's jurisdiction.

Court Disposition

Application for permission to appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Application for permission to appeal is dismissed
  • Consent order and compromise agreement remain in effect