Capital Bank Plc v Soor
The applicant failed to provide sufficient evidence or details to support his claim that further payments should have been credited. The respondent properly accounted for all payments for which evidence was provided. There was no procedural unfairness in the handling of evidence, and no grounds to set aside or vary the consent order.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Capital Bank PLC; Defendant/applicant: Harminder Soor
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Consent Orders, Guarantees, Variation of Court Orders, Summary Judgment, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Capital Bank PLC
Claimant/respondent
Harminder Soor
Defendant/applicant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judge erred in refusing to vary or set aside the consent order based on alleged uncredited payments
- 2 Whether the claimant/respondent failed to properly account for payments made by the defendant/applicant
- 3 Whether the lateness of the claimant's evidence prejudiced the defendant/applicant's case
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to provide sufficient evidence or details to support his claim that further payments should have been credited. The respondent properly accounted for all payments for which evidence was provided. There was no procedural unfairness in the handling of evidence, and no grounds to set aside or vary the consent order.
Court Disposition
Application for permission to appeal refused
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal refused with costs to the respondent
- Costs assessed summarily in the sum of £3,120, exclusive of VAT
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment