Nazham & Anor, R v [2004] EWCA Crim 491 (09 March 2004)

Nazham & Anor, R v [2004] EWCA Crim 491 (09 March 2004)

Although the judge's conduct in chambers was irregular and contrary to established guidance, the evidence showed that both appellants exercised a free and informed choice in pleading guilty, and the irregularity did not improperly fetter their decision or cause injustice. Therefore, the guilty pleas stand and the appeals are dismissed.

Citation
[2004] EWCA Crim 491
Parties
Prosecution: R; Appellant/defendant: Hameed Nazham; Appellant/defendant: Murtaza Nazham
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
09 March 2004
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction Following Guilty Plea
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Conspiracy to Defraud, Guilty Plea, Judicial Indication of Sentence, Freedom of Choice in Plea, Irregularity in Judicial Process
Criminal Law Conspiracy to Defraud Guilty Plea Judicial Indication of Sentence Freedom of Choice in Plea Irregularity in Judicial Process

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

R

Prosecution

Hameed Nazham

Appellant/defendant

Murtaza Nazham

Appellant/defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction Following Guilty Plea

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether an irregular conversation in chambers between judge and counsel improperly influenced the appellants' decision to plead guilty, rendering the pleas nullities
  2. 2 Whether the appellants' freedom of choice in entering guilty pleas was improperly fettered by judicial indication of sentence

Ratio Decidendi

Although the judge's conduct in chambers was irregular and contrary to established guidance, the evidence showed that both appellants exercised a free and informed choice in pleading guilty, and the irregularity did not improperly fetter their decision or cause injustice. Therefore, the guilty pleas stand and the appeals are dismissed.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed