City Inn (Jersey) Ltd v Ten Trinity Square Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 156 (06 March 2008)
The term 'Transferor' in the 1962 Transfer means only the Port of London Authority (PLA) as originally defined, not its successors in title. There is no commercial absurdity in this construction, and the drafting does not support an intention to benefit successors. The appeal is dismissed.
- Citation
- [2008] EWCA Civ 156
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: City Inn (Jersey) Limited; Defendant/appellant: Ten Trinity Square Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 March 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (civil) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Construction of Covenants, Successors in Title, Restrictive Covenants, Interpretation of Transfer Deeds
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
City Inn (Jersey) Limited
Claimant/respondent
Ten Trinity Square Limited
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal (civil) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the term 'Transferor' in the 1962 Transfer includes successors in title or is limited to the original transferor (PLA)
- 2 Whether the benefit of restrictive covenants in the Third Schedule runs with the land to successors in title
Ratio Decidendi
The term 'Transferor' in the 1962 Transfer means only the Port of London Authority (PLA) as originally defined, not its successors in title. There is no commercial absurdity in this construction, and the drafting does not support an intention to benefit successors. The appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal by Ten Trinity Square Limited is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment