SLB & Ors v PAK & Ors [2026] EWHC 449 (Comm) (02 March 2026)
The obligation to provide the refund guarantee within 120 days under Article X(A)(f) of the shipbuilding contracts is an innominate term, not a condition. The contract expressly provides for the consequences of failure to provide the guarantee—namely, a right of termination and refund of sums paid, but not loss of bargain damages. The parties did not make time of the essence for provision of the guarantee, and the range of possible breaches (from trivial to serious) indicates the term is innominate. The Buyers are not entitled to loss of bargain damages.
- Citation
- [2026] EWHC 449 (Comm)
- Parties
- Claimants/appellants: SLB and Others; Defendants/respondents: PAK and Others
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 March 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Under Section 69 Arbitration Act 1996 / Judgment on Appeal From Arbitral Award
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Construction of Contract Terms, Conditions and Innominate Terms, Remedies for Breach of Contract, Shipbuilding Contracts, Arbitration Appeals
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SLB and Others
Claimants/appellants
PAK and Others
Defendants/respondents
Procedural Posture
Appeal Under Section 69 Arbitration Act 1996 / Judgment on Appeal From Arbitral Award
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the obligation to provide a refund guarantee within 120 days under Article X(A)(f) of the shipbuilding contracts is a condition or an innominate term
- 2 Whether the Buyers are entitled to loss of bargain damages for failure to provide the refund guarantees
Ratio Decidendi
The obligation to provide the refund guarantee within 120 days under Article X(A)(f) of the shipbuilding contracts is an innominate term, not a condition. The contract expressly provides for the consequences of failure to provide the guarantee—namely, a right of termination and refund of sums paid, but not loss of bargain damages. The parties did not make time of the essence for provision of the guarantee, and the range of possible breaches (from trivial to serious) indicates the term is innominate. The Buyers are not entitled to loss of bargain damages.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed. The arbitral tribunal's finding that the obligation to provide the refund guarantee within 120 days is an innominate term is upheld. The Buyers are not entitled to loss of bargain damages.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment