Landau v Barclays Bank Plc
Mr Landau is entitled to 30% of the whole net recoveries under the Tomlin order, as the settlement was in connection with claims brought by reference to the second Grimleys report, and the side letter did not require apportionment between the three reports.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Leser Landau; Defendant/appellant: Barclays Bank Plc
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 January 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal and Cross Appeal From High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; cross-appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Construction of Contractual Terms, Assignment of Claims, Settlement Agreements, Entitlement to Settlement Proceeds
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Leser Landau
Claimant/respondent
Barclays Bank Plc
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal and Cross Appeal From High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Landau is entitled to 30% of the whole net recoveries under the Tomlin order or only a proportion referable to the second Grimleys report
- 2 Proper construction of the side letter dated 28th October 1997 regarding entitlement to settlement proceeds
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Landau is entitled to 30% of the whole net recoveries under the Tomlin order, as the settlement was in connection with claims brought by reference to the second Grimleys report, and the side letter did not require apportionment between the three reports.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; cross-appeal allowed
Orders
- Set aside the judge's order limiting entitlement to a proportion; declare entitlement to 30% of the whole net recoveries under the Tomlin order
- Order for payment of recalculated interest at 4.85%
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment